|
|
![]() ![]() WHY? |
Epilogue:
Kathy SchroederThe presses lack of interest and continuing silence about key
facts of Waco, and the obvious lack of journalistic investigating
is disheartening at the very least. Have any of the major news
sources filed Freedom Of Information Act papers to gain evidence?
Lee Hancock from Dallas Morning News has. Who else?
Mike McNulty breaks this case wide open, and the general press
barely yawn!
Why has the silence over Waco been so deafening? I cannot believe
what I have seen happen, ever since the FBI started it's one sided
news conferences in 93'. Before the siege even began, there was
complete biased reporting, ONLY echoing the carefully controlled
FBI press conferences. A systematic campaign began to demonize
these quiet people, and to further demonize the survivors, and
their grieving families, and the tradition continues today. I
guess it helps them sleep at night to justify their actions, by
spinning the tale. I simply do not know.
Why hasn't the press grabbed onto the evidence that dead Branch Davidian Michael Schroeder's MISSING dark blue stocking cap has been FOUND in an evidence room by Mike McNulty! VITAL evidence that his mother has been desperately searching for!

NO one has bothered to truly report their crucial side. Importantly,
no one in the past was allowed to see the innocents, and their
faces... those mothers and babies, who were normal and HUMAN as
any of us. I do not bother myself about their religion and what
they believed in, and that certainly wasn't the real issue there.
The FBI demonized them in front of all America, in effect, mocking
them, which somehow seemed to clear their conscious. They didn't
bat an eye in the end, to send in a deadly mixture of CS gas and
MC (methylene chloride)with the Bradley's.
When CS is burned, it produces hydrogen cyanide, the same gas
used to execute prisoners on Death Row. WHY weren't the press
reporting that to us?
It's right before your eyes. Who's pocket will it be hurting
to have such a thing printed? I don't understand the press and
how it is ran, I thought it was a much fairer medium than it apparently
is. The further silence about Waco has been sickening to say the
least.
Being a mother of two severe hemophiliac boys who need constant
care, I have to pay attention to laws and politics, I vote, I
abide the law, and I thought this was a free, a great country
where the truth could be told, the innocent let free if wrongly
accused, and crimes committed by criminals does not go unnoticed
or unpunished. EVEN if it was the government
that broke the laws. Are they not as responsible when they murder
as a common criminal is? I am so horrified trying to explain
this to my children.
I cannot imagine Sandy's horror at losing a precious child, and
I cant imagine how much all of this must have taken its toll on
all of Michaels family, and the continuing silence about Michaels
death is further taking its toll on them.
I am asking WHY IS THIS NECESSARY that they SUFFER?
WHY cant they get their answers? 6 years isn't enough time to
find all of Michaels documents, personal belongings, any information
pertaining to his death? Why would the Judge rule that any inquiry
into Michaels death was frivolous and unnecessary?
I do not understand, a one man crusade to publish EVIDENCE showing
GROSS governmental injustice and negligence, and a PRESS and JUDGE
that IGNORES it! Our government and it's agents are allowed to
shoot and kill on sight, and are IMMUNE
from the same laws as you and I? WHY
IS THAT?
Lon Horiuchi, a sniper from the Ruby Ridge
massacre then immediately sent to kill at Waco, was ruled to be
protected by the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which
keeps federal agents from state prosecution for actions within
the scope of their job. Someone jokingly pointed out that James
Bond was given pretty much the same clearance. The "00"
giving him complete permission to kill without consequence. Except
this is reality, and real people are being hunted down. Enter
Lon Horiuchi007. Catch him if you can....he's a slippery
snake to get a hold of.
The cry that any one opposing the "official" spin on things is immediately deemed a conspiracy nut, does not excuse away clear and viable evidence that exists, showing a clear trail of horrible mistakes, and forth knowledge of their negligent and intentional actions. They have admitted to targeting the room where the women and children hid. They CONCENTRATED on that room, awaiting the mothers "instincts" to get her children out of there. It's too bad most were dead from the cyanide gasses expelled from the heated fumes, some while their children were still alive to witness this! Where's the story about THAT? A dangerous chemical that kills... being used against AMERICANS? BEFORE we find them guilty of ANYTHING!?

The Branch Davidians are all but DEAD! And the ones that survived
are so darn OLD and sick, not to mention basically homeless...
it's pathetic and sad.
NO ONE is speaking out for them, and they are being demonized
a second time, and only a handful of people have even LOOKED into
their cases!



I recently became aware of Michael Schroeder's mother Sandy, and her desperate plight to find answers about her sons killing. She has told me a little about her ordeal in trying to track evidence and documents pertaining to the day of his shooting.
Michael's case:
Michael was killed by 14 law officers on February 28, 1993
while trying to ENTER Mt. Carmel after hearing word that his family
was being shot at. His wife, infant son, and 3 step children were
trapped inside their home that day. Two men followed along with
him. Each man grabbed a fire arm they owned for protection. In
Michaels case, witnesses say it was a 9mm.
6 of the 14 officers allowed to be questioned (the others have
NOT been under oath) state Michael stood in an open field,approximately
100 yards away, wearing a dark blue stocking cap, when officers
say they called out to him to halt and put his hands up and after
a period of 30 seconds of just staring at each other, Michael
raised his weapon and fired at officers. Officers say he fired
three times in their direction then with return fire, they opened
up on Michael's position. Norman Allison crouched in the bushes
next to Michael, trying to stay out of the line of fire.
All 14 officers were carrying various weapons ranging from snipers
rifles, to pistols and shotguns, Michael was said to be armed
with a pistol. Opposing accounts come from the man with Schroeder
that day. Sixty-two year old Bob Kendrick was laying down in the
grass on the other side of the hill from Michael Schroeder and
the firing agents, from his position... he wouldn't have been
able to see the shootout. But Kendrick swears the first three
shots were from a large caliber rifle, the
second shots were from Michael's side. The
first coming from the barn where agents were stationed.
Equally important is the collaborating statement made by one of the Special Agents who, when interviewed on March 5, by Texas Rangers, said: "Now, the fire, the fire sounded to me like what I know as rifle fire because it had that, that familiar crack at the end... it DIDN'T sound like 9mm fire. I know what 9mm rounds sound like."
They eventually hit Michael from his indefensible position, and he jerked a couple of times, the officers stated, and he fell. They watched him for several minutes, and called a cease fire while they waited to see what would happen.
Unfortunately what the coroners
pages tells us is much different....
It shows Michael was hit 6 times total. His torso and limbs were
the areas involved. One shot entered his right shoulder, punctured
his lung, and another which struck him just above the waist on
his right side, puncturing this young mans iliac artery.
Official cause of death is "internal injuries due to multiple
gunshot wounds"
Due to the extensive damage the above stated wounds caused, common
sense and laws of nature, shows us he wouldn't have been standing
very long, if at all after the first shot hit him, let
alone the 2nd... the 3rd... the 4th... the
5th... aaand the 6th??? As
Dick Reavis, Waco investigator and author said, it would take
subhuman strength to remain standing under those circumstances.
In a word... it ain't gonna happen.
The VERY important fact of this coroners report, is the fact that Michael Schroeder also suffered three other wounds that wouldn't have been listed as his cause of death, being the first described wounds would have been enough to kill him, and were reported as the killing shots.
The evidence shows he was probably already laying on the ground mortally wounded when shot twice in the temple. According to the coroners report, two were on the right side, going to the brain. The other was dead center to the back of his head, presumably an exit wound from one of the other two bullets ricocheting around inside of his head.
According to trial testimony of 6 of the agents, none of the lawmen would admit they approached Schroeder, or his corpse, to make sure that he was dead, WHO he was, or to perhaps offer him custody in a guarded hospital room till he was healed?
A few of the officers heard yelling coming from the vicinity of where Michael was, after calling out to the person to surrender, Norm Allison was placed into custody. As they walked the agents reported hearing two shots coming from where Michael's body lay. ALL of the officers claimed they didn't deliver any close shots to his head, and did not visually inspect the dead "suspect" what so ever.
There is a saying used by our Marines:
"I would rather die standing on two feet than live my life
on my knees."
Michael wasn't even given the dignity of dying in such a manner.
Existing evidence shows the BATF
agents, were bitterly angry over earlier BATF agents' deaths,
and gave very little warning as they started firing on Michael,
who's autopsy clearly shows he wouldn't have remained standing
long enough to receive the two gunshots to the head. The tremendous
evidence such as the shooting heard after some of the agents had
walked away and misleading officials into believing the cap was
missing, suggests that agents who were the only people in Michaels
area, came up to Michaels body and then "finished him off"
with two shots to his head.
The coroners report would of course correspond
with the officers statements about no close head shot being delivered.
ONLY because there was no trace of powder residue
usually found in such cases. Michael's
dark blue stocking cap would have acted
as a filter for the residue,
but there was a problem....
the fact that it disappeared en route to the coroner.

Michael's DARK
BLUE STOCKING CAP was last seen placed
inside the hood of his sweat shirt,just inches from his head when
his body was recovered FOUR days later. Then it simply DISAPPEARED.
It was not in his body bag, and did not turn up when Rangers tried
to investigate the shooting a second time.
Law officials LEFT that mans body to rot for FOUR days, while JEFF JAMAR REFUSED Rangers or ANY one from retrieving it, or investigating.
At the end of 4 days, finally Jeff Jamar allowed a limited search of the area surrounding Michael's death.
The Rangers requested to go back
and make footprint MOLDS around Michael's body to see if any of
the lawmen had approached Schroeder's body, after the shooting....
but JAMAR REFUSED
the request for TEN DAYS!!
WHY?
Texas Rangers bitterly complained that vital evidence was being
lost and Jamar is STILL REFUSING
them??? AND
STILL IGNORING Michael Schroeders
parents!?!?! WHY?
His reasoning was the safety of the agents
trying to retrieve the body, but NOT one shot was ever fired from
the Branch Davidians side, once the cease fire was called and
BATF removed it's agents from the property. Hundreds of soldiers
and troops, helicopters and tanks, and they cannot pick up a dead
man, or go inspect the site at ALL???
The fear of being shot was NOT a valid excuse for leaving this
man out there, and NOT allowing investigators inside to view the
evidence. I have not seen an excuse that was plausible enough
to allow this vital evidence be washed away!
Here is how I responded to your idea
about reinstating the wrongful death
suit. An e-mail to Joe Phillips, my contact at Caddell: Thank
you for the idea !
Hi Joe,
I have recently been in touch with Justice
Pareya. The purpose was to get a
conformed copy of Mike's complete file. After he finally got the
file out
and looked at it, he called to tell me that the file is STILL
OPEN! Open
because he too was stonewalled by the FBI, ATF, and Texas Rangers.
He is
looking into the circumstances surrounding Michael's death.
If it would not be too much to ask could
you please contact him with any
information you may have retrieved regarding Michael's death.
Also, would
this development give us the opportunity to have Michael's case
put back
into the wrongful death suit??
Anxiously awaiting your response.
Sandy
